PREDICTION OF USER BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL HOTSPOTS USING MULTI-MESSAGE INTERACTION AND NEURAL NETWORKS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The variety of communications under social hot themes in network public opinion analysis play a significant effect in user engagement behaviour. This paper suggests a prediction model of user participation behaviour during repeated messaging of hot social subjects while taking into account interactions between many messages and complex user behaviors. In order to better forecast user involvement behaviour, a multimessage interaction influence-driving mechanism was first presented. It takes into account how multimessage interaction affects user participation behaviour. Second, based on a multimessage interaction-driving mechanism and a BP neural network, this study proposes a user participant behaviour prediction model of social hotspots in light of the behavioral complexity of users participating in multimessage hotspots and the simple structure of BP neural networks (which can map complex nonlinear relationships). Finally, the user behaviour is iteratively guided by the multimessage interaction, which readily leads to overfitting of the BP neural network. A simulated annealing approach is used to optimize the conventional BP neural network to get around this issue and increase prediction accuracy. In evaluation studies, the model not only predicted user participation patterns in real-world scenarios including many messages, but it also quantified the relationships between various messages on trending subjects.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
M. Takayasu, K. Sato, Y. Sano, K. Yamada, W. Miura, and H. Takayasu, “Rumor diffusion and
convergence during the 3.11 earthquake: A Twitter case study,” Plops ONE, vol. 10, no. 4, Apr. 2015, Art.
no. e0121443.
Y. Du, Y. He, Y. Tian, Q. Chen, and L. Lin, “Microblog burst topic detection based on user
relationship,” in Proc. 6th IEEE Joint Int. Inf. Technol. Atif. Intel. Conf., vol. 1, Aug. 2011, pp. 260–263.
S. Giglio, G. Lo Re, and M. Morena, “A framework for real-time Twitter data analysis,” Computer.
Common., vol. 73, pp. 236–242, Jan. 2016. 4] G. Verma, A. Swami, and K. Chan, “The impact of competing
zealots on opinion dynamics,” Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 395, pp. 310–331, Feb. 2014.
L.-L. Ma, C. Ma, H.-F. Zhang, and B.-H. Wang, “Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks
based on gravity formula,” Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 451, pp. 205–212, Jun. 2016.
A. Mis love, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummed, P. Drescher, and B. Bhattacharjee, “Measurement and
analysis of online social networks,” in Proc. 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conf. Internet Meas., 2007, pp. 29–42.
X. Yun-Peng, L. Song-Yang, and L. Yan-Bing, “An information diffusion dynamic model based on
social influence and mean-field theory,” Acta Phys. Sinical, vol. 66, no. 3, 2017.
Q. Su, J. Huang, and X. Zhao, “An information propagation model considering incomplete reading
behavior in microblog,” Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 419, pp. 55–63, Feb. 2015.
L.-L. Xia, G.-P. Jiang, B. Song, and Y.-R. Song, “Rumor spreading model considering hesitating
mechanism in complex social networks,” Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 437, pp. 295–303, Nov. 2015.
R. Jie, J. Qiao, G. Xu, and Y. Meng, “A study on the interaction between two rumors in homogeneous
complex networks under symmetric conditions,” Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 454, pp. 129–142, Jul.
R.-Y. Tian, X.-F. Zhang, and Y.-J. Liu, “SSIC model: A multi-layer model for intervention of online
rumors spreading,” Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 427, pp. 181–191, Jun. 2015.
L. Zhang, Z. Qi, L. Guo, and L. Xu, “Research on online social network information diffusion detection
node selection algorithm based on the random walk model,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., vol. 13, no. 1, pp.
–981, Jan. 2016.
J. Golbeck, C. Robles, M. Edmondson, and K. Turner, “Predicting personality from twitter,” in Proc.
IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. Privacy, Secure., Risk Trust, IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. Social Comput., Oct. 2011, pp. 149–